In a Lagos court, Peter Okoye of the defunct P-Square group faced a heated cross-examination, with his former manager Jude Okoye’s counsel accusing him of misleading the EFCC with false claims regarding alleged royalty theft and financial access to company accounts
The trial involving Jude Okoye, former manager of the defunct music group P-Square, took a dramatic turn on Friday as his counsel, Clement Onwuenwunor (SAN), accused Peter Okoye (Mr P) of deliberately misleading the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) with false and contradictory claims.
Jude Okoye and his company, Northside Music Limited, are currently standing trial before the Lagos State Special Offences Court in Ikeja, facing four counts bordering on stealing and converting over $1 million and £34,000 in royalties derived from music digital distribution/publishing.
At the resumed trial on Friday, Peter Okoye concluded his testimony and underwent a rigorous cross-examination by the defence counsel.
During the cross-examination, Onwuenwunor told Justice Rahman Oshodi that Peter Okoye’s testimony was “riddled with inconsistencies and outright fabrications intended to mislead the EFCC and tarnish the reputation of the defendant, Jude Okoye.”
The defence notably discredited Peter’s earlier statement to the EFCC where he claimed to be a graduate of the University of Abuja. Onwuenwunor revealed that Peter had in fact dropped out of the university.
When confronted with this discrepancy, Peter initially tried to backtrack, stating he had only said he “attended” the university.
However, the defence presented the EFCC’s documented records showing Peter specifically described himself as a “graduate,” leading him to admit in open court that he had not completed his studies.
Further undermining Peter’s testimony, the defence presented documentary evidence indicating that both Peter and his twin brother, Paul, were not only aware of but also had signatory access to Northside Entertainment Limited accounts.
This directly contradicted Peter’s earlier claim that Jude Okoye was the sole signatory and that he had no access to the company’s financial dealings.
A bank mandate was produced, clearly designating Jude as a Category A signatory, while Peter and Paul were Category B signatories.
Peter’s testimony before the EFCC is riddled with lies and misrepresentations. He has made multiple assertions that have now been shown to be false under cross-examination. This is not just a matter of forgetfulness. This is an intentional effort to mislead investigators and this honourable court.
“My lord an account he is the only one that operates, I have never held a cheque,” Peter had previously told the court, adding that “Any time I demand for money, from Jude, he will send me $10,000, send to Paul and pay himself, as if I don’t have family to take care of, I have school fees to pay.”
However, the defence counsel also submitted bank statements showing Peter personally withdrew substantial sums in both naira and dollars from the company’s account.
Peter denied these, stating, “I did not lie, I don’t go to the bank, it is recently I started going to the bank. He gives the cheque to the assistant manager to cash the money from the bank and the manager pays it into my account.”
The defence also presented records of multiple direct transfers from Jude Okoye to Peter, directly contradicting Peter’s sworn statement that he never financially benefited from the company or deals managed by Jude.
Peter responded by claiming he was unaware the money was from Lex Records, as Jude simply paid into his account with his name appearing in the narration.
Peter also testified that his former manager, Jude, had “more than 47 bank accounts,” a detail he said he learned from the EFCC.
On the issue of royalty payments from Mad Solutions, the company managing P-Square’s music catalogue, Peter had claimed he was unaware of the contract and had only received $25,000 and $20,000 in royalties, implying siphoning by Jude.
However, the defence presented documents confirming that the agreement with Mad Solutions was signed by all three parties—Jude, Peter, and Paul—with equal entitlement to royalties.
These documents, the defence stated, showed Peter actually received $4,330.47 and $5,837.35 as his first and second payments, respectively, figures “far lower than the $25,000 and $20,000 he claimed under oath.”
“Peter’s testimony before the EFCC is riddled with lies and misrepresentations. He has made multiple assertions that have now been shown to be false under cross-examination.
This is not just a matter of forgetfulness. This is an intentional effort to mislead investigators and this honourable court,” Onwuenwunor told the court.
Justice Oshodi admitted several bank documents and EFCC statements as evidence, advising the defence to ensure all documents are made available to the prosecution to expedite the trial.
Earlier in his testimony, Peter claimed he was not entitled to proceeds from Jude’s company, alleging Jude used P-Square’s letterhead to sign other artists like Cynthia Morgan.
He asserted that the music catalogue belongs to Peter and Paul, with the manager only paid for managing, not ownership. He explained that they allowed Jude to manage them out of trust, being his brother.
Peter also told the court he discovered the account statements of Northside Music, which showed Jude and his wife (who owns 80% of the company) took almost $800,000 from the account, prompting him to report to the EFCC.
The trial has been adjourned to October 10 and 17, 2025, for continuation.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related